Pular para o conteúdo principal

Learning from rejections


experienced the first rejections of my scientific career when I applied to graduate school. I had graduated as the top student from my undergraduate program, but I didn't get into my top choice for grad school. In fact, about half my applications were met with rejection. I did not know how to cope. I felt that I had let my family and teachers down, and I was embarrassed and bitter. That was 3 years ago. Since then, I've continued to experience the rejections that are a routine part of scientific training and research. But I have learned that, with the right mindset and some initiative and introspection, I can transform rejections into useful lessons to strengthen my future work.

I did get into my second-choice graduate school. But I continued to learn the lessons of rejection when I failed to win a small-scale writing contest. At first, I felt rather discouraged. I worried that asking for feedback might seem inappropriate and that I might come across as a sore loser. But I reasoned that there was no better way for me to improve than to take the initiative and ask. I took my time drafting the email to make sure that my tone was sincere, and I ended up receiving valuable comments that equipped me to go on to win two similar competitions.
Following up after rejections can also open the door to unexpected opportunities. A year ago, for example, I applied unsuccessfully for a science writing internship. I asked the editor whether there were any other ways I could contribute, and I was surprised to learn that I was welcome to pitch ideas for articles that I wanted to write. (The editor also assured me that my application was of decent quality, which restored my confidence in my writing ability.) A few months later, I contacted the editor with a pitch, and I was thrilled to be offered a paid contract to contribute an article.
Even when you don't get individual feedback or immediate further opportunities, you can still help yourself by trying to figure out why your application wasn't successful. Last year, for example, when my application for a short-term fellowship to do research in Germany was rejected, I decided to look more closely at the winners from past years. I found that almost all of the funded fellows studied disease biology, while my proposal had focused more on using biology for engineering and materials applications. Realizing that my rejection was due—at least in part—to the fact that it was a bad fit, and not necessarily a reflection on the quality of my proposal, made me feel better about my research. I also learned that it's important to do my homework. Now, I ensure that my application is a good fit by learning who was successful, and sometimes even contacting them for advice, before submission.
In other cases, understanding the reasons behind a rejection can suggest concrete ways to strengthen your work. For example, after looking into the students who were chosen for a program to work as journalists at a conference—which I was rejected from 2 years in a row—it dawned on me that the organizers were looking for people with experience writing informal blogstyle articles. I didn't have this type of background, and I had been selling myself as an academic writer. So, I started reading more scientific blogs and recently got an opportunity to start writing for one, which I hope can help me avoid a third rejection. I also learned that sometimes I need to be patient and put in the time and work to accumulate credentials if I am not a good fit at the moment.
There's a lot of advice out there about not feeling down after rejections. I beg to differ. I believe that it's OK to be stressed, upset, frustrated, and even to harbor self-doubt. The important thing is to harness these feelings so that they lead to something productive. Frankly speaking, I still have a hard time when my applications fail. As a final-year Ph.D. student applying for postdoc fellowships, I get worried even thinking about potential rejection. But as I contend with these negative thoughts, I remind myself to pick myself up and transform rejections into positive lessons.
Posted by David Araripe

Comentários

Postagens mais visitadas deste blog

CONSERVAÇÃO DE ALIMENTOS E A EQUAÇÃO DE ARRHENIUS por Carlos Bravo Diaz, Universidade de Vigo, Espanha

Traduzido por Natanael F. França Rocha, Florianópolis, Brasil  A conservação de alimentos sempre foi uma das principais preocupações do ser humano. Conhecemos, já há bastante tempo, formas de armazenar cereais e também a utilização de azeite para evitar o contato do alimento com o oxigênio do ar e minimizar sua oxidação. Neste blog, podemos encontrar diversos ensaios sobre os métodos tradicionais de conservação de alimentos. Com o passar do tempo, os alimentos sofrem alterações que resultam em variações em diferentes parâmetros que vão definir sua "qualidade". Por exemplo, podem sofrer reações químicas (oxidação lipídica, Maillard, etc.) e bioquímicas (escurecimento enzimático, lipólise, etc.), microbianas (que podem ser úteis, por exemplo a fermentação, ou indesejáveis caso haja crescimento de agentes patogênicos) e por alterações físicas (coalescência, agregação, etc.). Vamos observar agora a tabela abaixo sobre a conservação de alimentos. Por que usamo

Two new proteins connected to plant development discovered by scientists

The discovery in the model plant Arabidopsis of two new proteins, RICE1 and RICE2, could lead to better ways to regulate plant structure and the ability to resist crop stresses such as drought, and ultimately to improve agricultural productivity, according to researchers at Texas A&M AgriLife Research. Credit: Graphic courtesy of Dr. Xiuren Zhang, Texas A&M AgriLife Research The discovery of two new proteins could lead to better ways to regulate plant structure and the ability to resist crop stresses such as drought, thus improving agriculture productivity, according to researchers at Texas A&M AgriLife Research. The two proteins, named RICE1 and RICE2, are described in the May issue of the journal eLife, based on the work of Dr. Xiuren Zhang, AgriLife Research biochemist in College Station. Zhang explained that DNA contains all the information needed to build a body, and molecules of RNA take that how-to information to the sites in the cell where they can be used

NIH completes atlas of human DNA differences that influence gene expression

Sections of the genome, known as expression Quantitative Trait Loci (eQTL) work to control how genes are turned off and on. Bethesda, Md. , Wed., Oct.11, 2017 - Researchers funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) have completed a detailed atlas documenting the stretches of human DNA that influence gene expression - a key way in which a person's genome gives rise to an observable trait, like hair color or disease risk. This atlas is a critical resource for the scientific community interested in how individual genomic variation leads to biological differences, like healthy and diseased states, across human tissues and cell types. The atlas is the culmination of work from the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) Consortium, established to catalog how genomic variation influences how genes are turned off and on. "GTEx was unique because its researchers explored how genomic variation affects the expression of genes in individual tissues, across many individuals, and