Pular para o conteúdo principal

Learning from rejections


experienced the first rejections of my scientific career when I applied to graduate school. I had graduated as the top student from my undergraduate program, but I didn't get into my top choice for grad school. In fact, about half my applications were met with rejection. I did not know how to cope. I felt that I had let my family and teachers down, and I was embarrassed and bitter. That was 3 years ago. Since then, I've continued to experience the rejections that are a routine part of scientific training and research. But I have learned that, with the right mindset and some initiative and introspection, I can transform rejections into useful lessons to strengthen my future work.

I did get into my second-choice graduate school. But I continued to learn the lessons of rejection when I failed to win a small-scale writing contest. At first, I felt rather discouraged. I worried that asking for feedback might seem inappropriate and that I might come across as a sore loser. But I reasoned that there was no better way for me to improve than to take the initiative and ask. I took my time drafting the email to make sure that my tone was sincere, and I ended up receiving valuable comments that equipped me to go on to win two similar competitions.
Following up after rejections can also open the door to unexpected opportunities. A year ago, for example, I applied unsuccessfully for a science writing internship. I asked the editor whether there were any other ways I could contribute, and I was surprised to learn that I was welcome to pitch ideas for articles that I wanted to write. (The editor also assured me that my application was of decent quality, which restored my confidence in my writing ability.) A few months later, I contacted the editor with a pitch, and I was thrilled to be offered a paid contract to contribute an article.
Even when you don't get individual feedback or immediate further opportunities, you can still help yourself by trying to figure out why your application wasn't successful. Last year, for example, when my application for a short-term fellowship to do research in Germany was rejected, I decided to look more closely at the winners from past years. I found that almost all of the funded fellows studied disease biology, while my proposal had focused more on using biology for engineering and materials applications. Realizing that my rejection was due—at least in part—to the fact that it was a bad fit, and not necessarily a reflection on the quality of my proposal, made me feel better about my research. I also learned that it's important to do my homework. Now, I ensure that my application is a good fit by learning who was successful, and sometimes even contacting them for advice, before submission.
In other cases, understanding the reasons behind a rejection can suggest concrete ways to strengthen your work. For example, after looking into the students who were chosen for a program to work as journalists at a conference—which I was rejected from 2 years in a row—it dawned on me that the organizers were looking for people with experience writing informal blogstyle articles. I didn't have this type of background, and I had been selling myself as an academic writer. So, I started reading more scientific blogs and recently got an opportunity to start writing for one, which I hope can help me avoid a third rejection. I also learned that sometimes I need to be patient and put in the time and work to accumulate credentials if I am not a good fit at the moment.
There's a lot of advice out there about not feeling down after rejections. I beg to differ. I believe that it's OK to be stressed, upset, frustrated, and even to harbor self-doubt. The important thing is to harness these feelings so that they lead to something productive. Frankly speaking, I still have a hard time when my applications fail. As a final-year Ph.D. student applying for postdoc fellowships, I get worried even thinking about potential rejection. But as I contend with these negative thoughts, I remind myself to pick myself up and transform rejections into positive lessons.
Posted by David Araripe

Comentários

Postagens mais visitadas deste blog

Transferring skills beyond the lab

Launching a nonresearch career doesn’t mean leaving behind everything you learned as a scientist. The skills you developed as you dove into your projects and communicated your results are valuable in many jobs. If you’re not convinced, read on for some specific examples of how Ph.D.-holders put their skills to use outside the lab. Learning new fields Kenneth Gibbs Jr. , Program director in the Division of Training, Workforce Development, and Diversity at the National Institute of General Medical Sciences Learning new fields is a skill I developed in graduate school that I continue to use now as I manage research grants in scientific areas that are outside my previous expertise. When I was a graduate student, I was very interested in stem cells and the signals that regulate them. At the time I didn't have a background in the topic, so I had to read lots of literature—where I encountered unfamiliar terms—to orient myself to the field, and then I would identify knowledgea...

Plásticos: Para produzir ou dar sumiço, chame as bactérias

Bactéria que produz plástico Pesquisadores da USP encontraram uma bactéria capaz de produzir um  biopolímero  - um polímero, ou plástico, produzido por um processo biotecnológico. Rotas biotecnológicas podem fabricar bioplásticos - e depois sumir com eles, degradando-os completamente.  A  Methylobacterium rhodesianum , que transforma o metano em um tipo de polímero ainda não caracterizado, foi identificada nas águas turvas e poluídas do Sistema Estuarino de Santos, no litoral de São Paulo. A equipe também encontrou a  Methylobacterium extorquens , que já se sabia ser produtora de PHB, ou polihidroxibutirato, um polímero da família dos polihidroxialcanoatos (PHA) com características físicas e mecânicas semelhantes às de resinas sintéticas como o polipropileno. "Ainda não caracterizamos o polímero produzido pela bactéria, mas nossas análises indicam que é bem diferente dos relatados na literatura científica," disse Elen Aquino Perpétuo, coordenadora d...

Mais uma doutora formada no BioMol-Lab

Dia 27 de Outubro de 2017 formou-se mais uma Doutora no BioMol-Lab. A aluna Antônia Simoni de Oliveira, orientada pela professora Kyria Santiago do Nascimento e co-orientada pelo professor Benildo Sousa Cavada, defendeu sua tese intitulada: "Produção e caracterização físico-química e biológica da cadeia alfa da lectina recombinante de Canavalia brasiliensis" A defesa aconteceu no auditório do Departamento de Bioquímica e Biologia Molecular, 907, da UFC. Declarada a aprovação, o BioMol-Lab agora conta com 50 mestres e 52 doutores formados no laboratório. Parabéns à Simoni, aos orientadores Kyria Santiago do Nascimento, Benildo Sousa Cavada e à todos envolvidos!